I’ve traveled away from my field site twice. The first time I returned, the community
gatekeeper (a man who serves as a liaison between community authorities and outsiders such as myself) asked me where his bread was.
I laughed his request off. Later,
my research assistant pulled me aside and said that bread is, in fact, expected
of returned travelers. Irritated by this anticipated but belatedly learned
cultural transaction, I substituted a box of tea for the bread and made a
mental note to not forget the bread next time.
Given the community gatekeeper’s political pull, I budgeted future bread
costs as an insurance premium against the potential sabotage of my research
efforts.
Apparently my research assistant also made a note. He made a note that anthropologists are
inherently eager to learn about culture and are not, in fact, culturally clairvoyant. Upon my most recent return from travels, my
assistant pulled me aside to let me know that because Ramadan had started it
would be a very nice token if I would recognize the community’s celebration by
providing a bag of sugar so as to gift people with an item valued for its sweet contribution to the sour porridge taken to break the daily fast. I think this was suggested because it
was correctly presumed that I did not possess the knowledge or skill to prepare
my own porridge and engage in the nightly porridge exchange that occurs at sunset,
when porridge made in one home is sent to another home and vice versa. So, two
weeks ago I returned to the community laden with a 50 kilo bag of sugar for the
community and 2 loaves of bread for the community gatekeeper. I spent the afternoon of my return making the
rounds and paying it forward. I
even acquiesced to my assistant’s assurance that the most appropriate thing to
do would be to deliver the sugar to the Imam before Friday prayers so he could announce
that I brought the community a bag of sugar.
Sugar for all! |
Collective farm labor is emerging a relevant context of such
sharing within my research. One of my field sites, one that can be described as
less integrated into the wage labor economy proffered by a nearby urban center,
is reliant on collective farm labor. Men
of a similar age cohort form groups of 5-10 that work as a rotating unit to
plow and weed members’ farms. The other
field site, a community that is more integrated into the wage labor economy, has fairly
effectively disintegrated this custom. With more community members spending their
time in wage labor jobs (largely in construction work), there is less time to
devote to collective work as well as more cash to compensate for that lack of
time. Attitudes about shared labor may
also be changing. One man in this field
site recently reported that he helped a friend on his farm and was unexpectedly
paid. Though its conjecture on my part
to suggest that cash integrated into this equation was a way to buy out a
reciprocal act, the negation of the reciprocity is worthy of attention.
As the share economy buzzes its way through the media in the
US, elements of the share economy fizzle in Ghana. This death is painful to watch because share
economies, as they most fully exist, are about more than eliminating cash. They are about building and sharing knowledge
as well as social relationships.
As I continue to learn about the causes and consequences of
distress as it relates to mental health, I’m finding that people present a lot
of worries and a decent amount of poor mental health symptoms.
However, very few people report actually acquiring worry sickness, a context specific illness that is similar to conditions of anxiety or depression. In
inquiring as to the ways that people manage to avoid getting worry sickness—how
they avoid letting their worries dictate their mental health—I’m learning that
social spaces are crucial. Men identify
farming collectives as not only sources of labor, but as sources of empathy and
shared experience. Collectives are
social units that help motivate individuals to think beyond their futile
thoughts. For farmers who have invested
all of their economic, social and physical resources in their crops, when those
crops suffer in a drought and that drought coincides with an existing phase of
pretty severe food insecurity, futility is an easy mindset to fall into. Farmers express that the collegiality and shared
experience of fellow collective members can help ameliorate those feelings. Every time
I hear a man share his experience with enduring the financial and ecological
constraints of farming so as to at least attempt to feed his family for at
least part of the year, Johnny Cash’s Worried
Man streams through my head. Here in
this corridor of Ghana, collectives, in part with other social spaces, help
ease the worried man syndrome that Johnny sings so true.
Farmers under distress are not unique to this part of Ghana. India continues to endure a higher than normal rate of farmer suicides associated with high levels of debt acquired through the purchase of expensive inputs. Farmers who fail to pay such debts back due to their inability to successfully navigate an economic system that is built off of their exploitation are unable to face the shame of failure that should not be theirs to bear. A similar situation is also captured in the ethnography Troubled Fields, a holistic analysis of how the effects of the political and economic reforms that resulted in the 1980s farm crisis resulted in increased mental health issues and suicide rates amongst men operating family farms in Oklahoma. Given such precedence, it will be distressing to watch how illnesses and behaviors associated with the distress of constrained farming manifest beyond the worried man syndrome as things like collective farming in rural Ghana go by the wayside.
Women at work in their own collective planting efforts |
Farmers under distress are not unique to this part of Ghana. India continues to endure a higher than normal rate of farmer suicides associated with high levels of debt acquired through the purchase of expensive inputs. Farmers who fail to pay such debts back due to their inability to successfully navigate an economic system that is built off of their exploitation are unable to face the shame of failure that should not be theirs to bear. A similar situation is also captured in the ethnography Troubled Fields, a holistic analysis of how the effects of the political and economic reforms that resulted in the 1980s farm crisis resulted in increased mental health issues and suicide rates amongst men operating family farms in Oklahoma. Given such precedence, it will be distressing to watch how illnesses and behaviors associated with the distress of constrained farming manifest beyond the worried man syndrome as things like collective farming in rural Ghana go by the wayside.
No comments:
Post a Comment