For the past 2 weeks I’ve struggled to
write a post about food insecurity. Food
insecurity has been the core focus of my studies the past 4 years and is a fundamental
aspect of my research. Not being able to write fluently about my engagement
with the topic was a bit disturbing. Yesterday, after another attempt that left
me agitated, I came home and begrudgingly began to do some ironing (a chore I
NEVER do in the US, but Ghanaians always look well pressed and as you know,
“I’m trying, oh!”).
To make the ironing less tedious, I put
on some Bob Dylan. At the outset of my
research I “joked” that I was going to make What Would Bob Dylan Do? the mantra
of my fieldwork. I made this declaration
because it is inevitable to have intellectual and logistical crises during
fieldwork that necessitate some sort of spiritual guidance. Because
of my everlasting commitment to Mr. Dylan, WWBDD? seemed appropriate.
As the wrinkles in my blouse refused to
un-wrinkle and my fated destiny of being an anthropologist who studies food
insecurity but can’t even write about food insecurity seemed sealed, Like a
Rolling Stone came on.
WWBDD? He wouldn’t struggle
to regurgitate and explain the Food and Agricultural Organization’s definition
of food insecurity. He’d write a
brilliant song that captures the very essence of food insecurity, that of an experience
of poverty. Take the first stanza:
Once upon a time you dressed so fine
You threw the bums a dime in your prime, didn’t you?
People’d call say, “Beware doll, you’re bound to fall”
You thought they were all kiddin’ you
You used to laugh about
Everyone that was hanging out
But now you don’t talk so loud
Now you don’t seem so proud
About having to be scrounging your next meal
How does it feel to be scrounging your next meal? It feels shitty. Being food insecure is more
than feeling hungry. It is feeling
shame. It is feeling worried about where
that next meal is going to come from. It
is feeling left out. As John Madeley
puts it in his book Hungry for Trade: How
the Poor Pay for Free Trade, “Lack
of food is the ultimate exclusion. When people don't have food they are
excluded from what the rest of society is doing regularly--eating.” My intent in researching food insecurity is
to look at this experiential aspect of it.
I’m not so much interested in the nutritional consequences of food
insecurity as I am the emotional, the psychological. This first stanza so defines that
experiential aspect of poverty.
Being food insecure is to feel part of
nothing, to feel all alone. Perhaps
nowhere in the world is this more apparent than the US. I give myself a lot of grief because I’m not
studying food insecurity in my own cultural context. National food insecurity rates in the US stand at around 16% While I will eventually become more involved in food insecurity
advocacy and research in my own country, I know that part of the reason I’ve
decided to do the research in Ghana is because the concept of food insecurity
is not segregated from the concept of poverty. In Ghana it is easy to engage
with food insecurity as a topic because it is acknowledged and addressed. Food insecurity in Ghana has its own
aspects of politics and power to contend with, but at least it is not an issue
swept under the rug. Food insecurity is
conflated with poverty. And poverty is
talked about A LOT here. Poverty is at
least part of the national discourse, so there is at least an extension to engage.
In the US food insecurity has to battle its way into the national discourse in order to be acknowledged as a piece of American reality. The fact that
Lily, a food insecure Muppet introduced on a Sesame Street special on hunger
induced scorn and controversy shows how we refuse to acknowledge the problem of food insecurity. The fact that Congress recently cut funding to food stamps shows how we deal
with food insecurity. In the US we conflate food insecurity with laziness. And laziness is punishable.
If I did my dissertation research in my own
country I imagine I would become so mired within the discourse of ignorance and intolerance that I would burn out. If I burn out
before I earn these damn letters I’ll be terribly upset.
I’ve always used Like a Rolling
Stone as a way to think about my own progress through life. My interpretation of this song when I first
really listened to it in my early 20s was about rolling through the ups and
downs of life. I was completely oblivious
to the greater political and economic context. I know, I know--what a D’oh
moment. But at the
forefront of 33, and at the forefront of my research on inequality, what seems
so apparent to me now is how this song is about how American progress is made
and lost--how the winners take wherever they have leverage to take and make
more losers.
Take stanza 3:
You
used to ride a chrome horse with your diplomat
Who carried on
his shoulder a Siamese cat
Ain’t it hard
when you discover that
He really wasn’t
where it’s at
After he took
from you everything he could steal.
American policy does not tolerate
losers. This is the attitude we show to poverty despite the fact that the
transition from winner to loser can be perilous and beyond your ability to
control.
What makes my Like a Rolling Stone
epiphany all the more timely, is the recent release of the first official music video. The setting of the video is a TV,
and we the viewer of the video are also the viewer of the TV. We control the channels and can change the
channels—from The Price is Right to sports shows to programs that pass as
news to housewives enmeshed in desperateness.
All along the way, the people involved in these shows sing the
lyrics. We change the channels and we
watch our everyday TV programs relay powerful lyrics about everyday life in America.
This so perfectly captures this moment
in time. As the Trans Pacific
Partnership bulldozes over us what is the hope that inequality will ever be
properly addressed? As the tar sand oil fields of Canada continue to be “debated”
what are our hopes of doing what we can to slow climate change? As citizens of our nation can’t afford to feed
themselves, what are the hopes for health care??
We hear the music. We know the music is there. We flip channels.
Poignant and powerful Jessica, on so many levels.
ReplyDelete